Loyola v Quebec, Part II: Freedom of Religion for Religious Organizations
This is the second of a two-part comment on the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) decision in Loyola High School v Quebec (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 12 [Loyola]. It will...
Author: Kirk Andrews
Loyola v Quebec, Part I – the Majority: Water in Loyola’s Wine
This is the first part of a two-part comment on the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) decision in Loyola High School v Quebec (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 12 [Loyola]. It...
ONCA Rejects Nuisance Claim Against Former Owner: French v Chrysler
Nuisance, defined as an unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of land, has long been understood as a statement of claim for disputes among neighbours. It is a basic...
Naming Names in the FRO: Ontario (MCSS) v John Doe
The Family Responsibility Office (“FRO”) is a division of the Ministry of Community and Social Services that is responsible for collecting, distributing, and enforcing child and spousal support payments. It...
